On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:45:40AM +0000, Bo Shen wrote:Agreed.
From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>The word "driver" doesn't need to appear in biding documents, and this
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/atmel-wm8904.txt | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/atmel-wm8904.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/atmel-wm8904.txt
index 8bbe50c..aca341c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/atmel-wm8904.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/atmel-wm8904.txt
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ Atmel ASoC driver with wm8904 audio codec complex
Required properties:
- compatible: "atmel,asoc-wm8904"
- atmel,model: The user-visible name of this sound complex.
+ - clocks: A list of clocks needed by the wm8904 chip.
+ - clock-output-names: Driver related clock names. Shall contain "pck0".
fails to describe what it sets out to. How about the following:
- clocks: a list of phandle + clock-specifier pairs, one for each entry
in clock-names.
- clock-names: Should contain "pck0"After thinking a bit more about it, this can be any programmable clk (pckX).
Thanks,
Mark.