Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPS and MOVAPD SSE instructions

[H. Peter Anvin]

After seeing the sheer number of one-off additions, I'm wondering if going through the opcode map systematically and see what is still missing might not be a bad idea.

On March 17, 2014 2:30:43 AM PDT, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Il 15/03/2014 23:42, H. Peter Anvin ha scritto:
>> Stupid question... what instructions do NOT need emulsion in KVM? It
>would seem that at least anything that touches memory would?
>
>Yes, indeed.  Anything that touches memory can be used on MMIO and then
>
>needs emulation.
>
>Paolo
>
>> On March 15, 2014 1:01:58 PM PDT, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>>> MS HCK test fails on 32-bit Windows 8.1 due to missing MOVAPS
>>> instruction emulation, this series adds it and while at it,
>>> it adds emulation of MOVAPD which is trivial to implement on
>>> top of MOVAPS.
>>>
>>> Igor Mammedov (2):
>>>  KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPS
>>>  KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPD
>>>
>>> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/