Re: [PATCH v11 13/27] iommu/exynos: support for device tree
From: Cho KyongHo
Date: Tue Mar 18 2014 - 06:52:24 EST
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:39:33 +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi KyongHo,
>
> On 14.03.2014 06:09, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > This commit adds device tree support for System MMU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 5 ++---
> > drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > index df56e4c..22af807 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > @@ -178,16 +178,15 @@ config TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU
> >
> > config EXYNOS_IOMMU
> > bool "Exynos IOMMU Support"
> > - depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU
> > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> > select IOMMU_API
> > + default n
> > help
> > Support for the IOMMU(System MMU) of Samsung Exynos application
>
> nit: There should be a white space before the opening parenthesis.
>
Ok. :)
> > processor family. This enables H/W multimedia accellerators to see
>
> typo: s/accellerators/accelerators/
>
Ok.
> > non-linear physical memory chunks as a linear memory in their
> > address spaces
> >
> > - If unsure, say N here.
> > -
> > config EXYNOS_IOMMU_DEBUG
> > bool "Debugging log for Exynos IOMMU"
> > depends on EXYNOS_IOMMU
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > index 33b424d..34feb04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> > @@ -497,7 +498,7 @@ void exynos_sysmmu_tlb_invalidate(struct device *dev)
> > read_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > -static int exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int __init exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > int irq, ret;
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -557,11 +558,23 @@ static int exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct platform_driver exynos_sysmmu_driver = {
> > - .probe = exynos_sysmmu_probe,
> > - .driver = {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static struct of_device_id sysmmu_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,sysmmu-v1", },
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,sysmmu-v2", },
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,sysmmu-v3.1", },
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,sysmmu-v3.2", },
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,sysmmu-v3.3", },
>
> Do you need all these compatible strings? I mean, are there any
> implementation differences that can't be identified by reading IP
> registers, such as REG_MMU_VERSION?
>
Unfortunately, there is a SoC which overrides REG_MMU_VERSION with
a value for RTL designers and it is not related to System MMU
versions.
Thank you.
KyongHo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/