Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf tools: Allocate thread map_groups dynamicaly

[Jiri Olsa]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:03:41PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:52:59 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:13:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:00:04 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > Moving towards sharing map groups within a process threads.
> >> >
> >> > Because of this we need the map groups to be dynamically
> >> > allocated. No other functional change is intended in here.
> >> > @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ void thread__find_addr_map(struct thread *thread,
> >> >  	al->cpumode = cpumode;
> >> >  	al->filtered = false;
> >> >  
> >> > -	if (machine == NULL) {
> >> > +	if ((machine == NULL) || (mg == NULL)) {
> >> >  		al->map = NULL;
> >> >  		return;
> >> >  	}
> >> 
> >> What about the kernel threads?  I guess they're not using thread->mg but
> >> machine->kmaps instead?
> >
> > The machine->kmaps is used to store kernel maps - core + modules.
> >
> > All threads (including kernel ones) are using thread->mg,
> > kernel threads have empty /proc/x/maps file.
> >
> > In case the sample address is detected within kernel space,
> > the machine->kmaps is used instead of thread->mg:
> 
> That means kernel threads don't need to allocate ->mg, right?  So I'd
> suggest checking cpumode first and then allocate ->mg for userspace maps
> only.

good idea, will do

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/