Re: [RFC v3] cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Mar 20 2014 - 05:33:43 EST

On 20 March 2014 14:54, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/20/2014 02:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> WARN_ON(policy->transition_ongoing);
> I guess you meant WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing)
> perhaps?


> I'm not sure whether its really worth it, because it kinda looks
> obvious. Not sure what kind of bugs it would catch. I can't think of any
> such scenario :-(

Just to catch if somebody is sending a POSTCHANGE one without first
sending a PRECHANGE one.. Just another check to make sure things are
in order.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at