Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] SP800-90A Deterministic Random Bit Generator
From: Stephan Mueller
Date: Thu Mar 20 2014 - 09:30:56 EST
Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2014, 09:12:55 schrieb Clemens Ladisch:
Hi Clemens,
> Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > This is a clean-room implementation of the DRBG defined in SP800-90A.
>
> Why? I guess it's for certification?
As per SP800-131A, the ANSI X9.31 DRNG is sunset by the end of 2014 and not
allowed to be used in FIPS 140-2 compliant environments. The kernel crypto API
implements an ANSI X9.31 DRNG in crypto/ansi_cprng.c as the only DRNG that
complies with FIPS 140-2 at this time.
Without a replacement for this ANSI X9.31 DRNG, the kernel will not have an
FIPS 140-2 approved DRNG any more starting from 2015.
>
> > +static bool drbg_fips_continuous_test(struct drbg_state *drbg,
> > + unsigned char *buf)
> > ...
> > + ret = memcmp(drbg->prev, buf, drbg_blocklen(drbg));
> > + ...
> > + /* invert the memcmp result, because the test shall pass when the
> > + * two compared values do not match */
> > + if (ret)
> > + return true;
> > + else
> > + return false;
>
> This looks strange. The return value of memcmp() is not really
> a boolean, and the code appears not to match the comment because the
> numeric value of ret is not actually inverted. How about this:
Correct, the comment does not match the code as I had invered the logic of
drbg_fips_continuous_test as per Rafael's comment. Yet, I did not update the
comment.
>
> ret = memcmp(...);
> ...
> /* the test shall pass when the compared values are not equal */
> return ret != 0;
I will add that change.
>
>
> Regards,
> Clemens
Thanks
Stephan
--
| Cui bono? |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/