Re: checkpatch on Kconfig files

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Andi,

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:21:21 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I believe that was Andi Kleen's pet peeve,
> > so I'll punt it back to him.
> 
> This was always in checkpatch. If you touch/move some existing
> code it blames you for the issues that were already there.
> 
> Not specific to this check.

Actually it is. I was not moving the Kconfig entry, and I was not
touching its help text either. Here checkpatch complained about
something which was in the context of the patch, not in added or
modified lines. I am not aware of any other check doing that,
thankfully.

If I obeyed to checkpatch and "fixed" the help text to make it happy,
the reviewer would have (rightfully) rejected my patch as mixing
unrelated changes together.

> If you disagree with the warnings just ignore them.

This is a false positive, and checkpatch explicitly asks for these to
be reported. Which is what I'm doing. Better tools make future
contributions better and easier.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/