Re: man termios

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

>> Peter, do you agree that Linux appears to differ from POSIX here? (Not
>> sure if you tried my test program to verify...)
>
>
> I did run the test program to validate that it's observed behavior is that
> implemented by Linux, with which I'm very familiar.
> I don't have a test setup for other *nixes.
>
> I would be interested to know the results of
>
>   ./noncanonical 0 5 3 0
>   hello

Solaris 10:
read() completes when 5 bytes received.
OpenBSD 5.4
read() completes when 5 bytes received.

> and
>
>   ./noncanonical 0 5 3 2
>    hel

Solaris
read blocks()
OpenBSD
read blocks


Plus my test case where Linux differs:

./noncanonical 100 5 3 0

Linux: read() returns after 3 bytes input

Solaris: read() returns only after 5 bytes input
OpenBSD: read() returns only after 5 bytes input


> on other platforms.
>
> With respect to POSIX compliance, it's hard to say. I'm not sure the
> spec contemplates the degenerate case where max bytes < MIN. And

Well, given the way the other implementations behave, I think it does
contemplate it, because it carefull avoids talking about the number of
bytes requested by read() in that case.

> specifically
> with regard to terminal i/o behavior, POSIX is essentially ex post facto,
> and is really documenting existing behavior.
>
> Other than the degenerate case of max bytes < MIN, is there any other
> variation between Solaris and Linux in non-canonical mode?

The only one I've seen is the one I noted. I haven't tested too
exhaustively though.

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/