Re: [PATCH 3/3] workqueue: Add anon workqueue sysfs hierarchy

[Tejun Heo]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 06:01:18PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 1) Call a per workqueue mutex when a work execute on an ordered workqueue. Although
>   contention should be very rare (only while we replace the workqueue attrs and
>   switch to a new worker), frequent locking may have a visible impact.
> 
> 2) Have a seperate worker for all ordered workqueues. But we may lose a bit of
>   serialization with other workqueues along the way.

Ordered workqueues are always bound to the fallback default worker
pool.  Why not just adjust cpus_allowed of the worker pool?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/