Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/2] lib/scatterlist: Make ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN an actual Kconfig
From: James Bottomley
Date: Sat Mar 22 2014 - 18:38:01 EST
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 22:23 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:31:21PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Perhaps now might be the time to ask which are the remaining
> > architectures that cannot do SG chaining and then we can fix them and
> > pull the whole thing out.
> Not quite. You're making the assumption that we can be sure that all
> the scatterlist users on an architecture have been converted - that's
> simply not true on ARM.
No I'm not, I said "now might be the time to ask which are the remaining
architectures that cannot do SG chaining" I think it's time to list them
so we know what work remains. I know we've got a bunch in parisc (all
of our iommu code in driver/parisc - about 5 different ones - are
unconverted). However, the conversion is pretty simple; it's mostly
replacing sglist++ with sglist=sg_next(sglist)
> We have some which have, and some which still
> have not been audited.
> The cases that get us here would be old platform DMA code which walks
> scatterlists handed to it from drivers - stuff like
> arch/arm/mach-rpc/dma.c (which probably can cope), and drivers/scsi/arm/*
> (which definitely can't because of their SCSI pointers save/restore
> handling message.) I know that's one case where SG_CHAIN definitely
> isn't supported on ARM.
> So, we had decided not to enable it, but this means that new stuff
> isn't benefitting from this. I've recently asked arm-soc to enable
> it for the modern multi-platform builds, because modern stuff really
> be written with correct SG chaining in mind.
OK, so lets see what the actual effort is.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/