[PATCH 3.8 40/81] cgroup: update cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() to grab siglock

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.8.13.20 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 532de3fc72adc2a6525c4d53c07bf81e1732083d upstream.

Currently, there's nothing preventing cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists()
from missing set PF_EXITING and race against cgroup_exit().  Depending
on the timing, cgroup_exit() may finish with the task still linked on
css_set leading to list corruption.  Fix it by grabbing siglock in
cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() so that PF_EXITING is guaranteed to be
visible.

This whole on-demand cg_list optimization is extremely fragile and has
ample possibility to lead to bugs which can cause things like
once-a-year oops during boot.  I'm wondering whether the better
approach would be just adding "cgroup_disable=all" handling which
disables the whole cgroup rather than tempting fate with this
on-demand craziness.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/cgroup.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index ba9e28c..a2d2c80 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2982,9 +2982,14 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void)
 		 * We should check if the process is exiting, otherwise
 		 * it will race with cgroup_exit() in that the list
 		 * entry won't be deleted though the process has exited.
+		 * Do it while holding siglock so that we don't end up
+		 * racing against cgroup_exit().
 		 */
+		spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
 		if (!(p->flags & PF_EXITING) && list_empty(&p->cg_list))
 			list_add(&p->cg_list, &p->cgroups->tasks);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
+
 		task_unlock(p);
 	} while_each_thread(g, p);
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/