Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] x86: Call efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range() on native EFI platform only

From: Matt Fleming
Date: Wed Mar 26 2014 - 09:00:33 EST


On Tue, 25 Mar, at 09:57:54PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Call efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range() on native EFI platform only.
> This is not needed and even it should not be called on platforms
> which wraps EFI infrastructure like Xen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index ce72964..992b67a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> set_bit(EFI_64BIT, &x86_efi_facility);
> }
>
> - if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> + if (!strncmp((char *)&boot_params.efi_info.efi_loader_signature, "EL", 2))
> efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range();
> #endif

This could do with a little bit more explanation. Why is it not
necessary to mark the EFI memory map that was passed to the kernel as
reserved in memblock?

--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/