Re: [RFC 4/4] cpuset: Add cpusets.quiesce option

[Li Zefan]

On 2014/3/20 21:49, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> For networking applications platforms need to provide one CPU per each user
> space data plane thread. These CPUs should not be interrupted by kernel at all
> unless userspace has requested for some syscalls. Currently, there are
> background kernel activities that are running on almost every CPU, like:
> timers/hrtimers/watchdogs/etc, and these are required to be migrated to other
> CPUs.
> 
> To achieve that, this patch adds another option to cpusets, i.e. 'quiesce'.
> Writing '1' on this file would migrate these unbound/unpinned timers/workqueues
> away from the CPUs of the cpuset in question. Writing '0' has no effect and this
> file can't be read from userspace as we aren't maintaining a state here.
> 

This doesn't look like a complete solution, because newer timers/workqueues can
still run in those CPUs. Seems like the proposal discussed is to support setting
cpu affinity for workqueues through sysfs. If so, we can migrate workqueues when
affinity is set, so we don't need this cpuset.quiesce ?

> Currently, only timers are migrated. This would be followed by other kernel
> infrastructure later.
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/