RE: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag
From: Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Mar 27 2014 - 00:07:47 EST
> > > > > > > + if (xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FWF)
> > > > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "isr: Enabled transmit FIFO is empty\n");
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + if (xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRF)
> > > > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "isr: Transmit FIFO watermark has been
> > > reached\n");
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While are these ones really needed to clear manually ?
> > > > >
> > > > > The reference manual doesn't mention about the requirement. So SAI
> should
> > > do
> > > > > the self-clearance.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I do think we should let it do the self-clearance, and shouldn't
> > > interfere
> > > > of them...
> > >
> > > SAI is supposed to ignore the interference, isn't it?
> > >
> >
> > Maybe, but I'm not very sure.
> > And these bits are all writable and readable.
>
> Double-confirmed? Because FWF and FRF should be read-only bits.
>
So let's just ignore the clearance of these bits in isr().
+++++
SAI Transmit Control Register (I2S1_TCSR) : 32 : R/W : 0000_0000h
-----
I have checked in the Vybrid and LS1 SoC datasheets, and they are all the
Same as above, and nothing else.
Have I missed ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/