[PATCH] LSM: Pass comm name via get_task_comm() [was: Re: [PATCH] Change task_struct->comm to use RCU.]

From: Richard Guy Briggs
Date: Thu Mar 27 2014 - 13:22:29 EST


On 14/03/12, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> > And the same phrase goes to James Morris...
> >
> > If you are sure that it is safe to use get_task_comm() from
> > dump_common_audit_data() and you prefer locked version, please pick up below
> > patch via your git tree.
> >
> > If you are unsure or prefer lockless version, I'll make a lockless version
> > using do_get_task_comm() proposed in this thread.
>
> If you can't understand whether your patch is correct or not, don't ask me
> to apply it to my tree.
>
> If you're unsure, get it reviewed first.

Steve (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/11/218 ) and James,

Are the labels on data output in LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK even right? The
general case gives pid and comm of current. Then the
LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK case gives pid and comm from the task handed in in
the struct common_audit_data pointer. They are a duplicate of the
general case without generating a new message. I expect this will cause
ausearch to ignore those latter two fields. Should the latter two be
renamed to something like ad_pid= and ad_comm= ?

Tetsuo, this conversation should have been on the linux-audit@xxxxxxxxxx
list the whole time...

> - James

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/