Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] ARM: at91: introduce OLD_IRQ_AT91 Kconfig option

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Saturday 29 March 2014 10:06:39 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Boris BREZILLON,
> 
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:59:01 +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> 
> > +config OLD_IRQ_AT91
> > +     bool
> > +     default false
> 
> I don't think "default false" is a valid Kconfig construct. It could be
> "default n", but that's useless since "default n" is the default
> behavior. So I believe you can simply get rid of that line.

I think the above is syntactically correct, but it would be highly confusing in
anyone ever does

config false
	def_bool y

;-)

Aside from that, these three have completely identical meaning:

config OLD_IRQ_AT91
	bool

config OLD_IRQ_AT91
	def_bool n

config OLD_IRQ_AT91
	bool
	default n

	Arnd


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/