[PATCH 3.2 148/200] genirq: Remove racy waitqueue_active check

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun Mar 30 2014 - 19:50:01 EST


3.2.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>

commit c685689fd24d310343ac33942e9a54a974ae9c43 upstream.

We hit one rare case below:

T1 calling disable_irq(), but hanging at synchronize_irq()
always;
The corresponding irq thread is in sleeping state;
And all CPUs are in idle state;

After analysis, we found there is one possible scenerio which
causes T1 is waiting there forever:
CPU0 CPU1
synchronize_irq()
wait_event()
spin_lock()
atomic_dec_and_test(&threads_active)
insert the __wait into queue
spin_unlock()
if(waitqueue_active)
atomic_read(&threads_active)
wake_up()

Here after inserted the __wait into queue on CPU0, and before
test if queue is empty on CPU1, there is no barrier, it maybe
cause it is not visible for CPU1 immediately, although CPU0 has
updated the queue list.
It is similar for CPU0 atomic_read() threads_active also.

So we'd need one smp_mb() before waitqueue_active.that, but removing
the waitqueue_active() check solves it as wel l and it makes
things simple and clear.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Xiaoming Wang <xiaoming.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393212590-32543-1-git-send-email-chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: The corresponding check is in irq_thread()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)

wake = atomic_dec_and_test(&desc->threads_active);

- if (wake && waitqueue_active(&desc->wait_for_threads))
+ if (wake)
wake_up(&desc->wait_for_threads);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/