Re: [PATCH RFC v4 2/2] clk: Add handling of clk parent and rate assigned from DT
From: Ben Dooks
Date: Tue Apr 01 2014 - 09:19:55 EST
On 31/03/14 21:06, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
This function adds a helper function to configure clock parents and rates
as specified in clock-parents, clock-rates DT properties for a consumer
device and a call to it before driver is bound to a device.
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I don't understand why you need the driver core to initialize this one
type of thing? That should be in a driver, or in a class, or at worse
case, the platform code.
What makes clocks so "unique" here?
I suppose the issue here is that a lot of drivers currently use
clocks and a number of systems have badly setup default clock trees
at start time.
Mark Brown and others have argued that the management of clocks which
is common to all devices should not live in the driver.
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/