Re: [PATCH regression] net: phy: fix initialization (config_init) for Marvel 88E1116R PHYs
From: Alexander Holler
Date: Wed Apr 02 2014 - 05:09:59 EST
Am 02.04.2014 02:57, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
2014-04-01 16:55 GMT-07:00 Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Commit 7cd1463664c2a15721ff4ccfb61d4d970815cb3d (introduced with 3.14)
changed the initialization of the mv643xx_eth driver to use phy_init_hw()
to reset the PHY. Unfortunately the initialization for the 88E1116R PHY
was broken such, that it used mdelay() instead of really waiting for a
reset to finish.
So the only big difference before
7cd1463664c2a15721ff4ccfb61d4d970815cb3d ("net: mv643xx_eth: use
phy_init_hw to reset PHY") is that we waited potentially forever for
the BMCR_RESET bit to get cleared, while now, we only wait for up to
500 milliseconds.
Could you verify the following two things before your patch gets merged:
- how long does it take for your PHY to clear the BMCR_RESET bit, is
it more than the allowed time out in
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c::phy_poll_reset
- is your PHY powered down (check BMCR_PWRDOWN), if that is the case,
we might be hitting some corner case where toggling BMCR_RESET will
power it on, but at the expense of waiting longer
I've done two tests with pr_info before and after the two resets in
m88e1116r_config_init:
with my patch:
-----------------------
dmesg | grep -A1 -B1 AHO
[ 1.090099] mv643xx_eth: MV-643xx 10/100/1000 ethernet driver version 1.4
[ 1.175916] AHO: before first reset
[ 1.179613] AHO: after first reset
[ 1.183743] AHO: before second reset
[ 1.187530] AHO: after second reset
[ 1.191905] mv643xx_eth_port mv643xx_eth_port.0 eth0: port 0 with MAC
address xx
--
[ 1.426487] netpoll: netconsole: device eth0 not up yet, forcing it
[ 1.505986] AHO: before first reset
[ 1.509725] AHO: after first reset
[ 1.513899] AHO: before second reset
[ 1.517754] AHO: after second reset
[ 1.521802] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
--
[ 21.372591] Adding 2996116k swap on /dev/sda3. Priority:-1 extents:1
across:2996116k
[ 28.305989] AHO: before first reset
[ 28.306200] AHO: after first reset
[ 28.306936] AHO: before second reset
[ 28.307153] AHO: after second reset
[ 31.509973] mv643xx_eth_port mv643xx_eth_port.0 eth0: link up, 1000
Mb/s, full duplex, flow control disabled
-----------------------
with mdelay (the value after reset is what contains MII_BMCR):
-----------------------
dmesg | grep -A1 -B1 AHO
[ 1.090072] mv643xx_eth: MV-643xx 10/100/1000 ethernet driver version 1.4
[ 1.175888] AHO: before first reset
[ 1.678806] AHO: after first reset 0x0
[ 1.683281] AHO: before second reset
[ 2.186288] AHO: after second reset 0x0
[ 2.191010] mv643xx_eth_port mv643xx_eth_port.0 eth0: port 0 with MAC
address xx
--
[ 2.426349] netpoll: netconsole: device eth0 not up yet, forcing it
[ 2.505917] AHO: before first reset
[ 2.605824] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using orion-ehci
--
[ 2.829987] hub 1-1:1.0: 4 ports detected
[ 3.044502] AHO: after first reset 0x0
[ 3.049133] AHO: before second reset
[ 3.126110] usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using
orion-ehci
--
[ 3.526107] usb 1-1.3: device descriptor read/64, error -32
[ 3.614264] AHO: after second reset 0x0
[ 3.618708] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
--
[ 21.335730] Adding 2996116k swap on /dev/sda3. Priority:-1 extents:1
across:2996116k
[ 28.195942] AHO: before first reset
[ 28.696270] AHO: after first reset 0x800
[ 28.696958] AHO: before second reset
[ 29.197354] AHO: after second reset 0x800
[ 111.612263] RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module.
-----------------------
So we see, the first reset in the last call of m88e1116r_config_init()
fails to complete in 500ms and the phy seems to be stuck afterwards,
but, for whatever reason, it doesn't need 500ms if mdelay isn't used (if
we can trust the timestamps).
(You can also see, I have netconsole enabled using netconsole=... in the
kernel cmdline).
That behaviour is reproducible. The first reset in the last call to
m88e1116r_config_init() always fails if mdelay is used.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/