Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property

[Antoine TÃnart]

On 03/04/2014 10:54, Antoine TÃnart wrote:
> Jisheng,
>
> On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700
> > Antoine TÃnart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Antoine TÃnart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index
> > > 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 ---
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
> > > nodes
> > > to be present and contain the properties described below.
> > > "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
> > >                   "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"
> > >                   "qcom,kpss-acc-v2"
> > > +                "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for
> >
> > why not "marvell,berlin-smp"?
>
> We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be
> compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too
> generic.
>
> We could use "marvell,88de31xx-smp" as Alexandre suggested.

"marvell,88de31xx-smp" is not a good choice too, since futur SoC may 
match the "xx" and not use this method. A better way should be to use 
the first SoC implementing the feature, so "marvell,88de3100".

Antoine

--
Antoine TÃnart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/