Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] grant-table, xen-netback: Introduce helper functions for grant copy operations

[David Vrabel]

On 03/04/14 09:12, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>>
>> Create helper functions for grant copy operations and use them in netback.
>>
[...]
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -275,23 +275,29 @@ static void xenvif_gop_frag_copy(struct xenvif *vif,
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>  			bytes = MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET - npo->copy_off;
>>
>>  		copy_gop = npo->copy + npo->copy_prod++;
>> -		copy_gop->flags = GNTCOPY_dest_gref;
>> -		copy_gop->len = bytes;
>>
>>  		if (foreign_vif) {
>> -			copy_gop->source.domid = foreign_vif->domid;
>> -			copy_gop->source.u.ref = foreign_gref;
>> -			copy_gop->flags |= GNTCOPY_source_gref;
>> +			gnttab_set_copy_op_ref_to_ref(copy_gop,
>> +						      foreign_gref,
>> +						      npo->copy_gref,
>> +						      foreign_vif->domid,
>> +						      offset,
>> +						      vif->domid,
>> +						      npo->copy_off,
>> +						      bytes,
>> +						      GNTCOPY_dest_gref |
>> +						      GNTCOPY_source_gref);
> 
> Can't you lose the flags here (and in the other variants)? Since
> they are implied by the variant of the function they could just be hardcoded
> there, couldn't they?

Even with that change these are still functions with 7 or 8 parameters
with no obvious order.  That's just awful.  The open-coded struct
initialization is better.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/