On 04/03/2014 09:17 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 00:27, schrieb Sebastian Hesselbarth:
On 04/03/2014 12:12 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
I am curious, how you determined above commit to be the cause of the
regression you are seeing. Can you bisect, if you didn't already?
There was no bisecting necessary. I've just looked at what changed in
mv643xx_eth since 3.13 and the first commit I've reverted was already a
hit. Reading a bit source revealed the differences between the old reset
and the newly used one and ended up with my patch (first try) and was a
hit too.
Honestly, your own fix changes a different driver than mv643xx_eth.
It changes stuff which now (through the mentioned commit) gets used
through the change in mv643xx_eth.
Sigh. You have proven youself that the commit isn't the root cause
of the issue you are seeing. Nor is "fixing" 88e1116r init sequence
a reasonable fix.