Re: [PATCH v2] mm: convert some level-less printks to pr_*

[Mitchel Humpherys]

On Thu, Apr 03 2014 at 09:33:15 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 13:35 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> >
>> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> []
>> > > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>> > >   * (C) 2011 Linux Foundation, Christoph Lameter
>> > >   */
>> > >
>> > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>> >
>> > This is implicitly used by some macros? If so then please define this
>> > elsewhere. I do not see any use in slub.c of this one.
>>
>> Hi Christoph
>>
>> All the pr_<level> macros use it.
>>
>> from include/linux/printk.h:
>
> Ok then why do you add the definition to slub.c?

Ah that was an oversight on my part after changing to pr_cont. I'll send
a v3 that removes the pr_fmt. Or I could send a v3 that leaves the
pr_fmt but changes the printk that the pr_cont's are continuing (at the
top of note_cmpxchg_failure) to pr_info, but that wouldn't be consistent
with the rest of the file, which is using hand-tagged printk's.

I don't know if it's worthwhile to convert all of the hand-tagged
printk's to the pr_ macros, but if so I can do that in a separate patch.

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/