Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:57:18PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>>>>N.B. Sorry for the duplicate. This patch series were resent as the
> >>>>>      original one was rejected by the vger.kernel.org list server
> >>>>>      due to long header. There is no change in content.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>v7->v8:
> >>>>>   - Remove one unneeded atomic operation from the slowpath, thus
> >>>>>     improving performance.
> >>>>>   - Simplify some of the codes and add more comments.
> >>>>>   - Test for X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR CPU feature bit to enable/disable
> >>>>>     unfair lock.
> >>>>>   - Reduce unfair lock slowpath lock stealing frequency depending
> >>>>>     on its distance from the queue head.
> >>>>>   - Add performance data for IvyBridge-EX CPU.
> >>>>FYI, your v7 patch with 32 VCPUs (on a 32 cpu socket machine) on an
> >>>>HVM guest under Xen after a while stops working. The workload
> >>>>is doing 'make -j32' on the Linux kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>>Completely unresponsive. Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>Thank for reporting that. I haven't done that much testing on Xen.
> >>>My focus was in KVM. I will perform more test on Xen to see if I
> >>>can reproduce the problem.
> >>>
> >>BTW, does the halting and sending IPI mechanism work in HVM? I saw
> >Yes.
> >>that in RHEL7, PV spinlock was explicitly disabled when in HVM mode.
> >>However, this piece of code isn't in upstream code. So I wonder if
> >>there is problem with that.
> >The PV ticketlock fixed it for HVM. It was disabled before because
> >the PV guests were using bytelocks while the HVM were using ticketlocks
> >and you couldnt' swap in PV bytelocks for ticketlocks during startup.
> 
> The RHEL7 code has used PV ticketlock already. RHEL7 uses a single
> kernel for all configurations. So PV ticketlock as well as Xen and
> KVM support was compiled in. I think booting the kernel on bare
> metal will cause the Xen code to work in HVM mode thus activating
> the PV spinlock code which has a negative impact on performance.

Huh? -EPARSE

> That may be why it was disabled so that the bare metal performance
> will not be impacted.

I am not following you.
> 
> BTW, could you send me more information about the configuration of
> the machine, like the .config file that you used?

Marcos, could you please send that information to Peter. Thanks!
> 
> -Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/