Re: 3.13: <module> disagrees about version of symbol <symbol>

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Apr 04 2014 - 21:13:42 EST


On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:38:10AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 01.04.2014 01:34, schrieb Andi Kleen:
> >> This problem persists in v3.14, i.e. I still have to revert
> >> 83460ec8dcac14142e7860a01fa59c267ac4657c in order to get a working
> >> kernel on i686. I would really appreciate if someone would actually read
> >> my original mail from about 3 months ago and write an answer.
> >
> > Can you resend it please?
>
> It's available here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/26/22
>
> For convenience, here is a copy-and-paste of the full text:

I did some experiments know and I can't find any 32bit modules
that do not load with 32bit MODVERSIONS on or off with
a current tree.

Do you have a specific config?
Specific compiler version?

Thanks,

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/