Re: [PATCH] queue_timer_on_next_cpu() should be static

[Viresh Kumar]

On 5 April 2014 13:39, Jet Chen <jet.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> the new introduced function queue_timer_on_next_cpu() should be defined as static
>
> Signed-off-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index 9e96853..1c00e10 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs)
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&watchdog_lock, flags);
>  }
>
> -void queue_timer_on_next_cpu(void)
> +static void queue_timer_on_next_cpu(void)
>  {
>         /*
>          * Cycle through CPUs to check if the CPUs stay synchronized to each

Thanks, will merge this into my patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/