Re: [PATCH V7 1/1] drivers/gpio: Altera soft IP GPIO driver and devicetree binding

From: Tien Hock Loh
Date: Mon Apr 07 2014 - 04:01:00 EST


On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Tien Hock Loh <thloh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Josh Cartwright <joshc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 06:27:43PM +0800, thloh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add driver support for Altera GPIO soft IP, including interrupts and I/O.
>>> Tested on Altera CV SoC board using dipsw and LED using LED framework.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> + }
>>> + altera_gc->domain = 0;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_init(&altera_gc->gpio_lock);
>>> +
>>> + id = pdev->id;
>>> +
>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "altr,gpio-bank-width", &reg))
>>> + /*By default assume full GPIO controller*/
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.ngpio = 32;
>>> + else
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.ngpio = reg;
>>> +
>>> + if (altera_gc->mmchip.gc.ngpio > 32) {
>>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>>> + "ngpio is greater than 32, defaulting to 32\n");
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.ngpio = 32;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.direction_input = altera_gpio_direction_input;
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.direction_output = altera_gpio_direction_output;
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.get = altera_gpio_get;
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.set = altera_gpio_set;
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.to_irq = altera_gpio_to_irq;
>>> + altera_gc->mmchip.gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>> +
>>> + ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(node, &altera_gc->mmchip);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed adding memory mapped gpiochip\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, altera_gc);
>>> +
>>> + altera_gc->mapped_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
>>>
>>
>> platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>
> OK.
>

platform_get_irq doesn't create the irq mapping which is needed by the
driver. Since this driver is targeted at using of, should I be using
irq_of_parse_and_map or should I still redo the codes with
platform_get_irq and irq_create_mapping? I think the latter would be
introducing code redundancy. Please advice.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/