Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:12:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:27PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
> > > to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
> > > equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
> > > 
> > >   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.
> > > 
> > > I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
> > > moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.
> > 
> > Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter?
> > I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-(
> 
> No of course not :-)
> 
> Also as noted elsewhere, I didn't actually do any PV muck yet. I spend
> the time trying to get my head around patch 1; all the while Waiman kept
> piling more and more on top.

Ah, I see. Looking forward to seeing your 'muck' code then :-)

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/