Re: [PATCH 3.2 17/18] cifs: ensure that uncached writes handle unmapped areas correctly
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Mon Apr 07 2014 - 15:14:53 EST
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 15:45 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7 April 2014 03:41, Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 00:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> 3.2.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > [...]
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> [...]
> > + /*
> > + * i + 1 now represents the number of pages we actually used in
> > + * the copy phase above.
> > + */
> > + npages = min(npages, i + 1);
>
> I'm having trouble understanding why min() is needed here. It
> shouldn't harm either, but I find it confusing.
Because in the case where no error occurred, the comment is not true:
i == npages and npages have been used. The loop used upstream works,
but it seemed a bit silly to use a loop here.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part