RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

[Winkler, Tomas]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikola Ciprich [mailto:nikola.ciprich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 16:26
> To: Winkler, Tomas
> Cc: Greg KH (gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nikola
> Ciprich
> Subject: Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> yes, I just checked source rpm and it's applied..
> 
> here are the dumps:
> 
> [root@k310test ~]# hexdump -s 0x48 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
> 0000048 a301 3900
> 000004c
> [root@k310test ~]# hexdump -s 0x40 -n 4 /proc/bus/pci/00/16.0
> 0000040 0345 000f
> 0000044

I'm not sure how this is possible that this is failing for you

if ((0xa301 & 0x600) == 0x200)
	goto no_mei; 
so this is okay, the driver should not bind

How the patch worked for you before this test?  

Sorry for asking but can you please double check your compilation setup. 
 
Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/