Re: [PATCH 3/3] edac: altera: Add SDRAM EDAC support for CycloneV/ArriaV

[Mark Rutland]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:03:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:40:17PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > The patches should be in the same series, but for review purposes it's
> > nicer if the bindings are separate patches from the code within that
> > series.
> >
> > I usually look at the drivers implementing bindings and prefer to be
> > Cc'd on the whole series, with both the binding and driver.
> 
> Right, but I got only the 3/3 patch on linux-edac which made me wonder.

Ah. The whole series should've been Cc'd to linux-edac; I didn't realise
that wasn't the case.

> So I'm guessing you or someone else would be picking the whole set once
> I've acked the EDAC part?

Typically the bindings would go with the driver via the appropriate
subsystem maintainer. That way we don't get bindings without drivers or
vice-versa if there's a problem part-way, and we don't end up with every
other driver going via a dt tree.

Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/