Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct tracepoint

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > 
> > > +{
> > > +	if (call->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT)
> > > +		return call->tp ? call->tp->name : NULL;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return call->name;
> > > +}
> > 
> > Also, you missed a bunch of conversions in trace_event.c file. Do a
> > search for '->name' and you'll find them. The ones that shouldn't be
> > converted are rather obvious (system, field, mod), but you'll see
> > others that were missed. I'm a bit nervous about what other ones may be
> > missed as well.
> 
> Got them. I noticed that I forgot to turn on CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE when
> I did the original swap from name to _name to find the sites to update.
> 
> I did test more recently with a config that has all the FTRACE and PERF
> features enabled, but that was after I swapped back from _name to name,
> so I did not catch those two sites.
> 
> I just swapped the field name to _name again, and did the build with
> all FTRACE and PERF config options enabled to be certain I did not miss
> any. Just to be extra sure, I'm doing a make allyesconfig too.
> 
> Then, I'm changing _name back to name, and I'll prepare this as v11.
> 
> Is that OK with you ?
> 

Maybe you want to build with an allmodconfig to make sure. You probably
did get everything, but just to be sure.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/