Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Apr 08 2014 - 15:55:52 EST
On 04/08/14 08:39, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting hardware is made up a per-CPU
>> interrupt for the L1 cache and a SPI interrupt for the L2.
>>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt
>> index b90fcc7c53cf..d7357e777399 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt
> Right, that's http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg308540.html
>
> So whoever picks those patches up, Lorenzo's doc needs to be in his tree
> first too.
>
> How about I review the EDAC part and an arm maintainer picks the whole
> series up? Would that be easier, logistically?
>
That sounds fine if you want to give an ack on the edac changes. I can
route it through arm-soc.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/