Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OCFS2: Remove NULL assignments on static

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Apr 09 2014 - 16:45:01 EST


On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 08:53:14 +0800 Wengang <wen.gang.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ___ 2014___04___09___ 04:13, Fabian Frederick ______:
> > static values are automatically initialized to NULL.
> >
>
> What's the badness if we do the assignments?

(top-posting repaired...)

Back in the olden days,

static int x = 0;

would consume space in the .data segment and

static int x;

would consume space in the .bss segment.


The .data segment is a part of vmlinux (because it contains non-zero
data) whereas .bss does not occupy space in vmlinux because .bss is
all-zero and can be built at runtime

So the effect of this patch would be to reduce the size of the kernel
image. Less disk space, less ROM space, etc.


I think more recent gcc's and linkers got smarter about that and move
initialized-to-zero .data into .bss anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/