Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched: Convert thread_group_cputime() to use for_each_thread()
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Thu Apr 10 2014 - 13:30:09 EST
On 04/10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:49:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2377,6 +2377,9 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
> /*
> * Careful: do_each_thread/while_each_thread is a double loop so
> * 'break' will not work as expected - use goto instead.
> + *
> + * Deprecated; use for_each_thread() instead; this has serious issues with
> + * g != current and RCU.
> */
Yes, thanks.
> #define do_each_thread(g, t) \
> for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = next_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do
> @@ -2384,11 +2387,8 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
> #define while_each_thread(g, t) \
> while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
>
> -#define __for_each_thread(signal, t) \
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &(signal)->thread_head, thread_node)
> -
> #define for_each_thread(p, t) \
> - __for_each_thread((p)->signal, t)
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &(p)->signal->thread_head, thread_node)
Why? __for_each_thread(signal) can generate a better code, if we do care.
In fact, ignoring the bad "signal" name, __for_each_thread(signal, t)
even looks better. "signal" represents the whole thread group.
But I won't argue. Besides, this reminds me about CONST_CAST() and making
task_struct->signal "const". This can improve the code generation too.
> +static inline __deprecated
> +struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
> {
Not sure... But probably fine too.
I already killed some users of next_thread(). This reminds me about
next_tid(), probably it should be converted too.
As for, say, __exit_signal() it really needs next_thread(). We can fix
it instead of deprecating, or we can add another one with another name.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/