Re: [PATCH -mm v2.2] mm: get rid of __GFP_KMEMCG

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 19:05:59 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Currently to allocate a page that should be charged to kmemcg (e.g.
> threadinfo), we pass __GFP_KMEMCG flag to the page allocator. The page
> allocated is then to be freed by free_memcg_kmem_pages. Apart from
> looking asymmetrical, this also requires intrusion to the general
> allocation path. So let's introduce separate functions that will
> alloc/free pages charged to kmemcg.
> 
> The new functions are called alloc_kmem_pages and free_kmem_pages. They
> should be used when the caller actually would like to use kmalloc, but
> has to fall back to the page allocator for the allocation is large. They
> only differ from alloc_pages and free_pages in that besides allocating
> or freeing pages they also charge them to the kmem resource counter of
> the current memory cgroup.
> 
> ...
>
> +void *kmalloc_order(size_t size, gfp_t flags, unsigned int order)
> +{
> +	void *ret;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	flags |= __GFP_COMP;
> +	page = alloc_kmem_pages(flags, order);
> +	ret = page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
> +	kmemleak_alloc(ret, size, 1, flags);
> +	return ret;
> +}

While we're in there it wouldn't hurt to document this: why it exists,
what it does, etc.  And why it sets __GFP_COMP.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/