Re: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix

[Miklos Szeredi]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
>>  #define __NR_finit_module    344
>>  #define __NR_sched_setattr   345
>>  #define __NR_sched_getattr   346
>> -#define NR_syscalls 345
>> +#define NR_syscalls 347
>>
>>  /*
>>   * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some
>
> Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly?
> I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have
> added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.

No, I don't mean to upstream directly.   So you can just drop my submission...

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/