Re: cred_guard_mutex vs seq_file::lock [was: Re: 3.14.0+/x86: lockdep and mutexes not getting along]
From: David Howells
Date: Fri Apr 11 2014 - 10:51:33 EST
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Al, David, any bright ideas on how to best fix this?
Have the seq_xxx() code throw an error if current->in_execve is true. I can't
think of any circumstance where execve() should be reading anything that uses
seq_xxx().
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/