Re: [PATCH] pwm_lpss: Add support for PCI devices

[Mika Westerberg]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:58:51PM +0800, Chew Chiau Ee wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Not all systems enumerate the PWM devices via ACPI. They can also be exposed
> via the PCI interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c |  160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> index 449e372..6f79bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   * Author: Chew Kean Ho <kean.ho.chew@xxxxxxxxx>
>   * Author: Chang Rebecca Swee Fun <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@xxxxxxxxx>
>   * Author: Chew Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.chew@xxxxxxxxx>
> + * Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   *
>   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>   * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> @@ -19,6 +20,9 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/pwm.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +
> +static int pci_drv, plat_drv;	/* So we know which drivers registered */
>  
>  #define PWM				0x00000000
>  #define PWM_ENABLE			BIT(31)
> @@ -34,6 +38,15 @@ struct pwm_lpss_chip {
>  	struct pwm_chip chip;
>  	void __iomem *regs;
>  	struct clk *clk;
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +};
> +
> +struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo {
> +	unsigned long clk_rate;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo byt_info = {
> +	25000000
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct pwm_lpss_chip *to_lpwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> @@ -55,7 +68,7 @@ static int pwm_lpss_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  	/* The equation is: base_unit = ((freq / c) * 65536) + correction */
>  	base_unit = freq * 65536;
>  
> -	c = clk_get_rate(lpwm->clk);
> +	c = lpwm->clk_rate;
>  	if (!c)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -113,52 +126,47 @@ static const struct pwm_ops pwm_lpss_ops = {
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  
> -static const struct acpi_device_id pwm_lpss_acpi_match[] = {
> -	{ "80860F09", 0 },
> -	{ },
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pwm_lpss_acpi_match);
> -
> -static int pwm_lpss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
> +			struct resource *r, struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *info)
>  {
>  	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm;
> -	struct resource *r;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	lpwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lpwm), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	lpwm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpwm), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!lpwm)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -	lpwm->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> +	lpwm->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, r);
>  	if (IS_ERR(lpwm->regs))
> -		return PTR_ERR(lpwm->regs);
> -
> -	lpwm->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(lpwm->clk)) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PWM clock\n");
> -		return PTR_ERR(lpwm->clk);
> +		return lpwm->regs;
> +
> +	if (info) {
> +		lpwm->clk_rate = info->clk_rate;
> +	} else {
> +		lpwm->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(lpwm->clk)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get PWM clock\n");
> +			return (void *)lpwm->clk;

Why the cast here?

> +		}
> +		lpwm->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lpwm->clk);
>  	}
>  
> -	lpwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	lpwm->chip.dev = dev;
>  	lpwm->chip.ops = &pwm_lpss_ops;
>  	lpwm->chip.base = -1;
>  	lpwm->chip.npwm = 1;
>  
>  	ret = pwmchip_add(&lpwm->chip);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add PWM chip: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to add PWM chip: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  	}
>  
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpwm);
> -	return 0;
> +	return lpwm;
>  }
>  
> -static int pwm_lpss_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int pwm_lpss_remove(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm)
>  {
> -	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	u32 ctrl;
>  
>  	ctrl = readl(lpwm->regs + PWM);
> @@ -167,17 +175,107 @@ static int pwm_lpss_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return pwmchip_remove(&lpwm->chip);
>  }
>  
> -static struct platform_driver pwm_lpss_driver = {
> +static int pwm_lpss_probe_pci(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +			      const struct pci_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *info;
> +	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	info =  (struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *)id->driver_data;
> +	lpwm = pwm_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, &pdev->resource[0], info);
> +	if (IS_ERR(lpwm))
> +		return PTR_ERR(lpwm);
> +
> +	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, lpwm);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void pwm_lpss_remove_pci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	pwm_lpss_remove(lpwm);
> +	pci_disable_device(pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct pci_device_id pwm_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0F08), (unsigned long)&byt_info},
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0F09), (unsigned long)&byt_info},

I think non-capital letters for hex numbers are more consistent. I.e
0x0f08.

> +	{ 0,}

{ },

as in the platform part looks better, IMO.

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pwm_lpss_pci_ids);
> +
> +static struct pci_driver pwm_lpss_driver_pci = {
> +	.name	= "pwm-lpss",
> +	.id_table	= pwm_lpss_pci_ids,

The platform part doesn't use tabs, so I think you should follow the style
here.

> +	.probe	= pwm_lpss_probe_pci,
> +	.remove	= pwm_lpss_remove_pci,
> +};
> +
> +static int pwm_lpss_probe_platform(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm;
> +	struct resource *r;
> +
> +	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +
> +	lpwm = pwm_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, r, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(lpwm))
> +		return PTR_ERR(lpwm);
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpwm);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwm_lpss_remove_platform(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	return pwm_lpss_remove(lpwm);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id pwm_lpss_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{ "80860F09", 0 },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pwm_lpss_acpi_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver pwm_lpss_driver_platform = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "pwm-lpss",
>  		.acpi_match_table = pwm_lpss_acpi_match,
>  	},
> -	.probe = pwm_lpss_probe,
> -	.remove = pwm_lpss_remove,
> +	.probe = pwm_lpss_probe_platform,
> +	.remove = pwm_lpss_remove_platform,
>  };
> -module_platform_driver(pwm_lpss_driver);
> +
> +static int __init pwm_init(void)
> +{
> +	pci_drv = pci_register_driver(&pwm_lpss_driver_pci);
> +	plat_drv = platform_driver_register(&pwm_lpss_driver_platform);
> +	if (pci_drv && plat_drv)
> +		return pci_drv;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit pwm_exit(void)
> +{
> +	if (!pci_drv)
> +		pci_unregister_driver(&pwm_lpss_driver_pci);
> +	if (!plat_drv)
> +		platform_driver_unregister(&pwm_lpss_driver_platform);
> +}
>  
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PWM driver for Intel LPSS");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>  MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-lpss");
> +
> +module_init(pwm_init);
> +module_exit(pwm_exit);

Maybe move these to follow the function defitions, like:

pwm_init()
{
}
module_init(pwm_init);

and so on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/