[PATCH 10/38] tick-common: remove extra checks from tick_check_new_device()

[Viresh Kumar]

tick_check_new_device() is calling tick_check_percpu() which has this as the
first test:

	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask))
		return false;

And so the same isn't required to be repeated by tick_check_new_device(). Remove
it.

This also initializes several variables during their definition only.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 949f3d3..395cbbd 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -269,16 +269,9 @@ bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
  */
 void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 {
-	struct clock_event_device *curdev;
-	struct tick_device *td;
-	int cpu;
-
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask))
-		goto out_bc;
-
-	td = tick_get_device(cpu);
-	curdev = td->evtdev;
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	struct tick_device *td = tick_get_device(cpu);
+	struct clock_event_device *curdev = td->evtdev;
 
 	/* cpu local device ? */
 	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, cpu))
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/