Re: [patch 2/2] lib/string.c: strlcpy() might read too far

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Apr 14 2014 - 17:46:31 EST


On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:47:31 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Imagine you have a user controlled variable at the end of a struct which
> is allocated at the end of a page. The strlen() could read beyond the
> mapped memory and cause an oops.

Well, it's hard to conceive of a situation where anything like this
could happen. Code which copies a string from userspace should
immediately ensure that the kernel copy is null-terminated. But... I
guess it's defense in depth.

> Probably there are two reasons why we have never hit this condition in
> real life. First you would have to be really unlucky for all the
> variables to line up so the oops can happen. Second we don't do a lot
> of fuzzing with invalid strings.
>
> The strnlen() call is obviously a little bit slower than strlen() but I
> have tested it and I think it's probably ok.

If we cared about speed we wouldn't take two passes across the input
string ;)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/