Re: [PATCH 24/38] tick-sched: don't check tick_nohz_full_cpu() in __tick_nohz_task_switch()

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:53:46PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> __tick_nohz_task_switch() calls tick_nohz_full_kick(), which is already checking
> tick_nohz_full_cpu() and so we don't need to repeat the same check here.
> 
> Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ack.

> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 256f4a3..5a99859 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -261,13 +261,9 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  
> -	if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> -		goto out;
> -
>  	if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped() && !can_stop_full_tick())
>  		tick_nohz_full_kick();
>  
> -out:
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/