Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: s5m8767: Use same binding for external control as in s2mps11

[Sachin Kamat]

On 15 April 2014 13:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On wto, 2014-04-15 at 13:26 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> On 15 April 2014 02:41, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:09:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> >
>> >> -     - s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios: (optional) GPIO specifier for one
>> >> +     - samsung,ext-control-gpios: (optional) GPIO specifier for one
>> >>               GPIO controlling this regulator (enable/disable); This is
>> >>               valid only for buck9.
>> >
>> > This is an incompatible change.  It's OK to deprecate the old property
>> > but it's bad form to just remove it.
>>
>> I agree with Mark. Also, there is no need to make it generic.
>
> I thought it would be good to make it consistent and to reduce the
> number of bindings with same meaning on similar drivers.

How about making the other one use "s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios"
compatible instead of introducing a new one?

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/