Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: Device tree for AXM55xx.

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Apr 15 2014 - 08:46:26 EST


On Tuesday 15 April 2014 14:06:11 Anders Berg wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1760d6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/boot/dts/axm5516-amarillo.dts
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 LSI
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */

It's better to use a permissive license such as the BSD license for dts files,
so they can be shared with other OSs.

The situation with the clocks is still very strange: either the bindings
are all in need of update, or you got all devices wrong:

> + serial0: uart@2010080000 {
> + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell";
> + reg = <0x20 0x10080000 0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk_per>, <&clk_per>;
> + clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };

"uartclk" is not a valid string for pl011, as per binding:

| - clocks: When present, must refer to exactly one clock named
| "apb_pclk"

I do see that a lot of platforms do the same thing you have here, not
sure who is wrong.

> + timer0: timer@2010091000 {
> + compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell";
> + reg = <0x20 0x10091000 0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 46 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 46 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 47 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 48 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 51 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk_per>, <&clk_per>;
> + clock-names = "timclken1", "apb_pclk";

Citing the binding:

| - clocks: clocks driving the dual timer hardware. This list should be 1 or 3
| clocks. With 3 clocks, the order is timer0 clock, timer1 clock,
| apb_pclk. A single clock can also be specified if the same clock is
| used for all clock inputs.

I think you only want to have one clock here and make that the "apb_pclk".

> + gpio0: gpio@2010092000 {
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + compatible = "arm,pl061", "arm,primecell";
> + gpio-controller;
> + reg = <0x20 0x10092000 0x00 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk_per>;
> + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> + status = "disabled";

The pl061 binding does not specify any clocks at all. Do we need to update
that?

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/