Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence: Add dependency on ARCH_ZYNQ

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> > I sent the patch for it which solve this problem in generic way.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/42
> 
> > Feel free to give me ACK for it.
> 
> Will has been working on this too off and on, he was also trying to
> define some semantics for the relaxed versions.  It'd be really good to
> address this properly, this is a constant source of make work.

Yes, I have a series adding relaxed accessors to all architectures (and
asm-generic) along with an attempt at defining some semantics. This came
about from discussion with BenH at the last kernel summit, I just didn't get
around to posting what we came up with.

I should be able to post something this week, but there's still an open
question relating to mmiowb() that I'd like the PPC guys to chime in on.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/