Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support

[Timur Tabi]

Westerberg, Mika wrote:
> > >That is, when the kernel parses the ASL, and it seems a command to
> > >configure pin #3 to function #4, it calls the local pinctrl driver to do
> > >that?

> I'm not aware of ASL code that allows you to do that. Do you have examples?

No, that's my point.  I was expecting the pinmux functions of the 
pinctrl driver are used by ACPI, but apparently they aren't, and that's 
why I'm asking.  I'm wondering why a pinctrl driver for an ACPI platform 
should be defining pinmux function groups.  I haven't gotten a straight 
answer to that question.

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/