On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 18:01 +0200, Svenning SÃrensen wrote:Yes, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list at the moment - too much traffic and too little time..
You are right, of course, there are more effective ways to catch buggyIt seems you missed the recent tipc thread then.
drivers.
But they will probably also be much more expensive.
This one is very cheap, being in a relatively cold path, especially
compared to the memcpy in the same path.
Neither do I.
They are many ways this code path can be abused, your patch only takes
care of one case.
In tipc case, they added skb to shinfo->frag_list without changing
skb->data_len.
So skb_tailroom(to) was not returning 0 as it should.
The invariant should be more strict.
BUG_ON(to->data + to->len != skb_tail_pointer(to));
I still think a BUG() to catch this is better.
There is no guarantee the developer/user will catch a WARN(),
the bug could sit there a long time.
I have no pity for serious bugs like that.
Strange, I was almost certain that I saw at least one with the same bug, but I can't seem to find it any longer.
Since you spot buggy drivers, please provide their fixes or at least
name them so that we can take care of them.
Thanks