Re: [PATCH 03/15] ARM: dts: kirkwood: add stdout-path property to all boards

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Thu May 01 2014 - 03:36:31 EST


On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2014 22:21:30 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Yes, we *can* move it in kirkwood.dtsi, but IMHO we *should* keep it in
> > > the board files. I see the "chosen" node and its properties as _the_
> > > board node.
> > >
> > > One could argue then, that we should count the memory properties too and
> > > put the most common in the SoC dtsi. But you are right, as UART0 is also
> > > the UART with boot support, it is likely to be always connected to
> > > a more-or-less accessible console output.
> > >
> > > I really have no strong opinion about it.
> >
> > Me neithe, but the advantage of putting it in kirkwood.dtsi is that it
> > then does not get forgotten, and is always there for bearbox to use.
>
> I would prefer having it in the board.dts file out of principle, but I
> agree it's not very important either way.

OK, then i can add my

Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

I will try to do some testing over the weekend.

Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/