Re: [PATCH 14/17] mm: Do not use atomic operations when releasing pages
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Thu May 01 2014 - 09:39:48 EST
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:29:22AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > There should be no references to it any more and a parallel mark should
> > not be reordered against us. Use non-locked varient to clear page active.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/swap.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index f2228b7..7a5bdd7 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr, bool cold)
> > }
> >
> > /* Clear Active bit in case of parallel mark_page_accessed */
> > - ClearPageActive(page);
> > + __ClearPageActive(page);
>
> Shouldn't this comment be removed also?
Why? We're still clearing the active bit.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/