Re: [RFC 09/16] kgr: mark task_safe in some kthreads

[Tejun Heo]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Some threads do not use kthread_should_stop. Before we enable a

Haven't really following kgraft development but is it safe to assume
that all kthread_should_stop() usages are clean side-effect-less
boundaries?  If so, why is that property guaranteed?  Is there any
mechanism for sanity checks?  Maybe I'm just failing to understand how
the whole thing is supposed to work but this looks like it could
devolve into something more broken than the freezer which we haven't
fully recovered from yet.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/